Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Journal of Rural Management
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S.
Right arrow Articles by Phansalkar, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

India's Water Future 2050

Potential Deviations from ‘Business-as-Usual’

Shilp Verma

Shilp Verma is with the Department of Management and Institutions, UNESCO-IHE, The Netherlands. E-mail: s.verma{at}cgiar.org

Sanjiv J. Phansalkar

Sanjiv J. Phansalkar is a senior researcher and team leader at IWMI-Tata Water Policy Programme in Anand, Gujarat. E-mail: s.phansalkar{at}cgiar.org, sanjiv.phansalkar{at}gmail.com

The debate on India's ambitious river-linking project is highly polarized. While the proponents insist that scores of highly qualified engineer-years have been invested in studying the feasibility of the links, the analysis is not available in the public domain. On the other hand, the opponents argue that the project is a conspiracy to hide the past inefficiencies of the irrigation bureaucracy; and yet, the alternatives proposed by them for India's impending water challenge also seem far from concrete. This article critically examines the National Commission Integrated Water Resource Development (NCIWRD) report, which has repeatedly been cited as the basis for planning and justifying the project, and outlines a framework for research which will help in raising the level of this important national debate by helping to develop a refined, textured and nuanced understanding of ‘India's water future 2050’.

References

  • Bhalla, G.S. and P. Hazell. 1998. ‘ Food Grains Demand in India to 2020: A Preliminary Exercise ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 32 (52): A150–64 .
  • Bhamoriya, V. 2004. ‘Wastewater Irrigation in Vadodara, Gujarat, India: Economic Catalyst for Marginalized Communities’, in C.A. Scott, N.I. Faruqui and L. Raschid-Sally (eds), Wastewater Use in Irrigated Agriculture: Confronting the Livelihood and Environmental Realities. Cambridge, MA, USA: CABI Publications in association with the IWMI and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) .
  • Buechler, S. and M. Gayathri Devi. 2003. ‘Wastewater as a source of multiple livelihoods?: A study in rural Andhra Pradesh, South India’, in R. Devi and N. Ahsan (eds), Water and Wastewater: Developing Country Perspectives, pp. 939–47. London, UK: IWMI .
  • Central Ground Water Board (CGWB). 1995. Groundwater Resources of India. New Delhi: Central Ground Water Board, Government of India .
  • Chakravarty, S. and L.B. Singh. 1994. Water Economy through Drip Irrigation, in Proceedings of the 20th WEDC Conference, Colombo, Sri Lanka. (http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/cv/wedc/papers/20/sessiong/chakrava.pdf)
  • Dyson, T. and A. Hanchate. 2000. ‘ India's Demographic and Food Prospects: State Level Analysis ’, Economic and Political Weekly, Special Article, 11 November, XXXV (46).
  • Indian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (INCID). 1994. Drip Irrigation in India. New Delhi: INCID .
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 1998. The Regional Impacts of Climate Change: an assessment of vulnerability. IPCC. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) . 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 2003. ‘ Strategic Analysis of India's National River-Linking Project (NRLP) ’. Proposal submitted to the CGIAR's Challenge Program on Water and Food.
  • Kulkarni, S.Y. 1987. ‘ Sprinkler and Drip Irrigation System ’, Sinchan, October, 6 (3): 56–61 .
  • Magar, S.S., N.N. Firke and J.R. Kadam. 1988. ‘ Importance of Drip Irrigation ’, Sinchan, October, 7 (2): 61–62 .
  • Mohan, R. and S. Dasgupta. 2004. ‘ The 21st Century: Asia Becomes Urban ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 15 January, 40 (3): 213–23 .
  • Narayanamoorthy, A. 1996. ‘ Impact of Drip Irrigation on Consumption of Water and Electricity ’, The Asian Economic Review, December, 38 (3): 350–64 .
  • Narayanamoorthy, A. 1997. ‘ Drip Irrigation: A Viable Option for Future Irrigation Development ’, Productivity, October–December, 38 (3): 504–11 .
  • National Commission for Integrated Water Resource Development (NCIWRD). 1999. Integrated Water Resource Development: A Plan for Action, report of the NCIWRD. Volume I. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India .
  • Pandit, C. 2004. E-mail Correspondence, Personal Communication.
  • Polak, P. and R.K. Sivanappan. 1998. ‘ The Potential Contribution of Low Cost Drip Irrigation to the Improvement of Irrigation Productivity in India ’, in India—Water Resources Management Sector Review, Report on the Irrigation Sector. The World Bank, in Cooperation with the Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India.
  • Ravi, C. 1998. ‘Food Demand Projections for India’. Unpublished Report; Special Study Commissioned by the NCIWRD.
  • Rosegrant, M., X. Cai and S. A. Cline. 2002. World Water and Food to 2025: Dealing with Scarcity. USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) .
  • Seckler, D., D. Molden, U. Amarasinghe and C. de Fraiture. 2000. Overview of the Data and Analysis. World Water Supply and Demand: 1995–2025. Monograph. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI .
  • Shah, T. and J. Keller. 2002. ‘Micro-irrigation and the Poor: A Marketing Challenge in Smallholder Irrigation Development’, in H. Sally and C.L. Abernethy (eds), Private irrigation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Regional Seminar on Private Sector Participation and Irrigation Expansion in Sub-Saharan Africa, pp. 165–83. Accra, Ghana , 22–26 October, 2001.
  • Shah, T., C. Scott, A. Kishore and A. Sharma. 2003. Energy-Irrigation Nexus in South Asia: Improving Groundwater Conservation and Power Sector Viability. Research Report 70, IWMI, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
  • Singh, R. 2003. ‘ Interlinking of Rivers ’, Discussion, Economic and Political Weekly, 38 (40).
  • Sivanappan, R. K. 1994. ‘ Prospects of Micro-irrigation in India ’, Irrigation and Drainage Systems, No. 8: 49–58 .
  • Strzepek, K.M. 2001. ‘Models for Assessment of Global water Issues in 2025’, in F.R. Rijsberman (ed.), World Water Scenarios: Analyses, pp. 46–61 London, UK: Earthscan .
  • UN. 1995. World Population Prospects: The 1994 Revision. United Nations (UN). New York .
  • UN. 1999a. World Population Prospects: The 1998 Revision. New York: United Nations , Volume 1, Comprehensive Tables.
  • UN. 1999b. The Demographic Impact of HIV/AIDS. New York: United Nations (UN), ESA/P/WP.152.
  • UN. 2002. ‘World Population Prospects: The 2002 Revision’. United Nations (UN) Population Division, Population Database. (http://esa.un.org/unpp/)
  • Verma, S. and S.J. Phansalkar. 2004. ‘ Water Control and Tribal Livelihoods in Orissa ’. Paper submitted for presentation at the National Symposium on Participatory Natural Resource Management in Watersheds, Orissa Watershed Development Mission, Bhubaneshwar, Orissa.
  • Verma, S., S. Tsephal and T. Jose. 2004. ‘ Pepsee Systems: Grassroots Innovation Under Groundwater Stress ’, Water Policy, 6(3): 1–16 .
  • Visaria, L. and P. Visaria. 1996. Prospective Population Growth and Policy Options for India, 1991–2001. New York: The Population Council .

International Journal of Rural Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, 149-179 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/097300520700300107


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, S.
Right arrow Articles by Phansalkar, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?